Author name: admin

News

SIRIUSXM: The David Webb Show: The left’s obsession with identity politics, drag shows for kids, and parental rights in schools

Given the news that broke of drag shows being presented to children as well as ongoing debate over Disney’s opposition to the Florida ban on teaching gender reassignment to 5 year-olds, New Tolerance Campaign President Gregory T. Angelo joins David Webb to discuss this issue and the fact that actions like this do NOT have the support of all gay people. Listen to David Webb’s show here.

Past Campaigns

NTC Advocates Asked the ACLU to Apologize for Its Role in the Depp-Heard Trial

Update (6-15-22) The verdict is in: actress Amber Heard was found guilty in a court of law for defamation — and the ACLU has been found guilty in the court of public opinion for helping her. At the core of the case: a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which Heard implied her ex-husband, actor Johnny Depp, abused her. Depp denied the allegations, and a jury agreed the cost to his career was worth a $15 million judgement against Heard. The driving force behind the op-ed: the ACLU. The organization was “involved in conceiving, drafting and placing” the piece, according to testimony from ACLU Chief Operating Officer Terrence Dougherty. “As a longtime ACLU member and a supporter, I am totally appalled that the ACLU saw this very dysfunctional marriage as a tool to promote its own message, and further its own policies,” Richard Klein, the husband of a former ACLU Director, stated. “The ACLU is a legal organization, and one which is now, it pains me to say, a disgraced group of attorneys.” NTC advocates asked ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero to publicly apologize for orchestrating this defamation, but the ACLU has yet to take responsibility for its role in the trial.       [Photo credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)]

Legacy NTC Campaigns

NTC Advocates Emailed Georgetown Law Asking Them To Uphold Their Own Free Speech Policy

Update (6-7-2022):  NTC advocates rallied to support Shaprio and emailed Georgetown Law Dean William Treanor asking him to accept Ilya Shapiro’s apology and uphold Georgetown’s policy on freedom of speech.  Sadly, Georgetown fell short of its own stated policies about free speech. After Georgtown Law’s “investigation” into Shapiro’s tweet they allowed him to stay on faculty, but made it clear that they could monitor his social media. Following that, Shapiro joined the Manhattan Institute as their Director of Constitutional Studies.  On January 21, constitutional law scholar and expert on the Supreme Court Ilya Shapiro was announced by Georgetown Law as executive director and senior lecturer at the Georgetown Center for the Constitution. Shapiro’s role was set to begin on February 1 — until a tweet about President Biden’s insistence that his next SCOTUS pick will be a black woman. “Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. Even has identity politics benefit of being first Asian (Indian) American,” Shapiro tweeted on January 26. “But alas doesn’t fit into the latest intersectionality hierarchy so we’ll get lesser black woman.” Shapiro deleted the tweet and apologized. Soon thereafter, Georgetown’s Black Law Students Association demanded that Shapiro’s job offer be rescinded. More generally, Shapiro was expressing a sentiment shared by an overwhelming majority of Americans, 76% of whom want Biden to consider “all possible nominees” for the highest court according to an ABC News/Ipsos poll released on January 30, rather than play identity politics and further politicize what should be an objective body. And as Dan McLaughlin framed it in National Review: “Ilya’s use of the words ‘lesser black woman’ in this context was not the ideal way of phrasing this critique, but then, Twitter is fast-moving, space-constrained, and has no edit function, so it is hardly unusual to see things phrased there awkwardly.” Contrast this with Georgetown’s handling of Georgetown professor Carol Christine Fair, who wrote in 2018 that all “entitled white” Republicans supporting the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme court deserved to be killed: “All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps,” she declared. “Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.” Georgetown’s response to inquiries about Ms. Fair? “Our policy does not prohibit speech based on the person presenting ideas or the content of those ideas, even when those ideas may be difficult, controversial or objectionable,” the university said in a statement to Fox News. “While faculty members may exercise freedom of speech, we expect that their classrooms and interaction with students be free of bias and geared toward thoughtful, respectful dialogue.” Georgetown’s Human Resources Policy Manual states that “it is not the proper role of a university to insulate individuals from ideas and opinions they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive. Deliberation or debate may not be suppressed because the ideas put forth are thought by some or even by most members of the University community to be offensive, unwise, immoral, or ill conceived. It is for the individual members of the University community, not for the University as an institution, to judge the value of ideas, and to act on those judgments not by seeking to suppress speech, but by openly and vigorously contesting those arguments and ideas that they oppose.” In the case of Ilya Shapiro, Georgetown Law will show whether these are genuine values or simply hollow words.

News

Washington Times: U.S. businesses push transgender advocacy for Pride Month

Out Leadership — an LGBTQ business network with 94 corporate members including Amazon, American Express, Bloomberg, Citi, Coca-Cola, Comcast, Goldman Sachs, IBM, Microsoft, Nike and Walmart — says it’s good business to embrace those gender identity trends. But Gregory T. Angelo, president of the conservative New Tolerance Campaign, says businesses lose longtime customers by celebrating ever more-marginalized “sexual orientations and identities.” “Gay has become boring, so the left needs to find new oppressed identities to feed the cash cow,” said Mr. Angelo, who is gay. “When you embrace a wide array of nontraditional identities, you’re going to alienate traditionalists.” Read more in The Washington Times here.

Press Releases

New Tolerance Campaign Calls Out ACLU for Orchestrating Amber Heard’s Defamation of Johnny Depp

Grassroots supporters across the United States demanding accountability from ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero Washington, DC — The New Tolerance Campaign (NTC) today launched a campaign drawing attention to the key role the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) played in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation case. On June 1, a jury found Heard guilty on all counts, concluding she was responsible for libel and awarding Depp with a $15 million judgement. At the core of the case: a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which Heard implied her ex-husband, actor Johnny Depp, abused her. Depp denied the allegations, and a jury agreed. The driving force behind the op-ed: the ACLU. The organization was “involved in conceiving, drafting and placing” the piece, according to testimony during the trial from ACLU Chief Operating Officer Terrence Dougherty. “The ACLU has been accused of a leftward drift in recent years, but it would be more accurate to say the organization is careening downward,” New Tolerance Campaign President Gregory T. Angelo stated. “The Depp-Heard trial made it clear that the ACLU is willing to use a dysfunctional relationship as a crass tool in pursuit of its own agenda. In the aftermath of this high-profile trial, questions about the ACLU’s disgraceful role remain. The campaign NTC launched today is empowering grassroots activists to demand answers.” About the New Tolerance Campaign: The New Tolerance Campaign (NTC) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit watchdog organization mobilizing Americans to confront intolerance double-standards by establishment institutions, civil rights groups, universities, and socially conscious brands. NTC campaigns empower everyday Americans to hold accountable self-proclaimed arbiters of tolerance when they betray their own stated values. For interview requests and additional comment, email communications@newtolerance.org.           [Photo credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)]

Past Campaigns

Washingtonian Magazine Must Answer for CAIR Recognition

Washingtonian magazine’s new “Most Influential People” annual list highlights the head of CAIR — despite the extremist group’s exposure by NPR for an organizational culture of widespread misogyny and sexual harassment. CAIR leader Nihad Awad has been condemned by the ADL for a history of anti-Semitic remarks, including claiming that Israel “is the biggest threat to world peace and security.” The Washingtonian ignored this intolerance when recognizing Awad. He and his organization’s long track record of extremism, bigotry, and misogyny should have disqualified him from any recognition. Send a message to Washingtonian CEO Catherine Merrill here! [Photo credit: Voice of America – M. Elshinnawi, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)]

News

Chalkboard Review: Gregory T. Angelo: LGBTQ Policies in K-12

What should a teacher tell a student who says they were born girl but think they are a boy? Gregory T. Angelo of the New Tolerance Campaign joins Tony Kinnett on the latest episode of the Teacher’s Lounge to discuss LGBTQIA+ policies in K-12 schools & other related topics such as speech as violence, teachers who think they are “mom” & being called a “gay homophobe.” You can listen to the rest on Anchor.fm.

News

Stop Corporate Tyranny: New Tolerance Campaign Sends Letter to “Un-American” Express CEO Demanding Answers to “Woke” Policies

In a letter co-signed by Color Us United and Consumers’ Research, the New Tolerance Campaign demanded American Express CEO Steve Squeri provide transparency into the company’s woke “diversity” instruction. The company has reportedly implemented race-based hiring initiatives and other un-American practices as part of its $1 billion investment in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Yet the company refuses to disclose exactly what it is teaching employees. “The alarming revelations about the company’s culture, hiring and bonus practices, and corporate trainings present major potential liabilities for its brand,” stated NTC’s President Gregory T. Angelo. Read more at Stop Corporate Tyranny here.

News

Washington Times: Conservatives Rack Up Wins Against “Woke” Corporations

Three conservative groups — New Tolerance Campaign, Color Us United and Consumers’ Research — sent a letter asking American Express CEO Steve Squeri to end several policies at the credit card company’s shareholders meeting this Tuesday. The letter highlights internal company documents about staff training in “microaggressions” and support for Black Lives Matter. It also cites documents showing that American Express ties 15% of executive bonuses to a colleague diversity policy that incentivizes managers to hire and fire employees based on their race and sex. Mr. Angelo, a former executive director of the conservative LBGTQ group Log Cabin Republicans, said “woke” virtue signaling “doesn’t get much worse than AmEx.” Read more in The Washington Times here.

Press Releases

New Tolerance Campaign Sends Letter to “Un-American” Express CEO Demanding Answers to “Woke” Policies

Color Us United, Consumers’ Research join in call for financial institution to open the books on “diversity” instruction at its May 3 shareholder meeting Washington, DC — The New Tolerance Campaign (NTC) today sent a letter to American Express CEO Steve Squeri addressing likely asset waste and civil rights law noncompliance at the financial services company. Color Us United and Consumers’ Research, partners with NTC in the UnAmerican Express initiative, joined as co-signers of the letter. American Express will convene its annual shareholder meeting on Tuesday, May 3. The letter requests that AmEx CEO Steve Squeri use that opportunity to respond to the release of internal documents unearthed last year that showed, among other things, company trainings instructing staff on “microaggressions” and encouraging support for Black Lives Matter, a movement that declares it wants to “disrupt” the traditional “nuclear family structure” and stop “heteronormative thinking.” Perhaps most concerning of all: documents that show American Express tied 15% of executive bonuses to a “colleague” metric of “diversity,” incentivizing managers to hire and terminate employees based on their race and sex. The letter asserts that “to prevent the waste of the Company’s assets, to repair and safeguard the Company’s brand, goodwill, and reputation among its customers, to protect the Company’s shareholders, and in fulfillment of your fiduciary duties to the Company and its shareholders to ensure compliance with civil rights laws,” the Board of Directors of American Express must “immediately release all documentation pertaining to diversity curricula; race-based employment policies implemented or discussed for implementation by the Company’s human resources arm; and all salary, bonus, and stock options tied to said policies.” Additionally, the letter instructs American Express, in accordance with its fiduciary obligations, to “[r]etain an independent third party to conduct a culture audit” and “compel the Company’s management to implement genuinely effective and objective internal controls to prevent the Company from violating civil rights and ensure a welcoming workplace.” You can read the full letter here. “American Express shareholders and customers deserve transparency and accountability,” New Tolerance Campaign President Gregory T. Angelo stated. “The alarming revelations about the company’s culture, hiring and bonus practices, and corporate trainings present major potential liabilities for its brand. CEO Steve Squeri must announce the implementation of the reforms proposed in our letter when American Express holds its annual shareholder meeting on May 3.” The letter is the latest salvo in the UnAmerican Express campaign, a massive 50-state initiative to rebrand financial giant American Express as “UnAmerican Express” by exposing the radical, divisive, and coercive policies at the financial institution that are at their core antithetical to American values. The campaign features aggressive social media, radio and television advertising (see commercial here), and grassroots action demanding state pension fund divestment from American Express. To date more than 32,000 messages have been sent via NTC’s platform to state pension trustees requesting this action. More information can be found at the campaign’s central website unamericanexpress.com. About the New Tolerance Campaign: NTC is a nonprofit watchdog organization that mobilizes Americans to hold corporations, media outlets, celebrities, universities, and other influential institutions accountable when they display double standards in their actions and rhetoric. ###

Past Campaigns

Tell the ACLU: Support Elon Musk’s Vision of Free Speech at Twitter

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is at it again, flouting their stated mission and targeting their ire at one of their own card-carrying members: Elon Musk. On April 25 the billionaire owner of Tesla and SpaceX made waves with the announcement that social media giant Twitter had accepted his offer to buy out the platform. “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” Musk stated following the deal. “I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans. Twitter has tremendous potential — I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it.” Free speech, greater transparency, and open debate — principles that should be welcomed by the ACLU, the massive nonprofit founded on defending freedom of expression. Such an embrace was not to be extended by the organization. “While Elon Musk is an ACLU card-carrying member and one of our most significant supporters, there’s a lot of danger having so much power in the hands of any one individual,” ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said. He continued: “We should be worried about any powerful central actor, whether it’s a government or any wealthy individual — even if it’s an ACLU member — having so much control over the boundaries of our political speech online.” The ACLU expressed no such concerns about Jack Dorsey when he wielded the exact same power and influence over Twitter before its initial public offering. Does the ACLU stand for civil liberties for everyone? Or just those they agree with? “The extreme antibody reaction from those who fear free speech says it all,” Musk tweeted on April 26. This isn’t the first time the ACLU has seemingly forgotten what the “CL” in its acronym stands for. The organization has a storied history as an objective defender of American civil liberties — however controversial the individual or vile the speech, the ACLU built a reputation around a mission that the Constitution protects everyone. Sadly, in recent years, the ACLU has made a drastic departure from its stated mission. Once a bastion of free speech, the ACLU has allowed social justice trends direct its actions. A 2021 New York Times exposé revealed the ACLU can’t decide if it wants to stick to its founding principles or become just another soldier in the progressive cause. Join us in holding the ACLU accountable: ask them to support their stated mission or be honest and change it! [Photo credit: Heisenberg Media, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (cropped)]

Scroll to Top